Abdome aberto ou fechado pós-laparotomia para controle de sepse de foco intra-abdominal severa: uma análise de sobrevivência
Open or closed abdomen post laparotomy to control severe abdominal sepsis: a survival analysis
Imad Shehadeh; Luciano de Andrade; Ariana Ieda Lima Ferreira da Silva; Pedro Henrique Iora; Eduardo Falco Knaut; Giordanna Chiqueto Duarte; Carlos Edmundo Rodrigues Fontes
Resumo
Introdução: a sepse abdominal grave, com peritonite difusa, é um grande desafio para o cirurgião geral, sendo muito frequente as reintervenções cirúrgicas e complicações desta doença, que apresenta morbimortalidade elevada. A proposta do abdome aberto, aplicando-se a terapia por pressão negativa (TPN), reduz o tempo operatório da primeira abordagem cirúrgica, reduz o acúmulo de secreções e mediadores inflamatórios no sítio abdominal, diminui a possibilidade de síndrome compartimental abdominal e suas complicações. A outra técnica é a síntese primária, quando é optado por fechar a parede por completo.
Métodos: o objetivo do estudo foi realizar uma análise de sobrevivência comparando os tratamentos de sepse intra-abdominal severa com Abdome Aberto e Fechado após laparotomia em um hospital universitário no sul do Brasil. As variáveis foram obtidas a partir de prontuários eletrônicos de pacientes submetidos à intervenção cirúrgica e realizou-se uma análise descritiva e de sobrevivência usando a curva de Kaplan-Meier e o teste de log-rank.
Resultados: a amostra incluiu 75 laparotomias em 5 anos (40 TPN e 35 sínteses primárias), com mortalidade de 55%. A sobrevida entre os métodos de fechamento não demonstrou significância estatística, mesmo após a divisão em um grupo de análise de cada técnica.
Conclusão: recentes publicações destacam resultados favoráveis do abdome aberto, enfatizando a necessidade urgente de uma sistematização na assistência de pacientes com sepse abdominal complicada grave.
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Introduction: severe abdominal sepsis, accompained by diffuse peritonitis, poses a significant challenge for most surgeons. It often requires repetitive surgical interventions, leading to complications and resulting in high morbidity and mortality rates. The open abdomen technique, facilitated by applying a negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT), reduces the duration of the initial surgical procedure, minimizes the accumulation of secretions and inflammatory mediators in the abdominal cavity and lowers the risk of abdominal compartment syndrome and its associated complications. Another approach is primary closure of the abdominal aponeurosis, which involves suturing the layers of the abdominal wall.
Methods: the objective of this study is to conduct a survival analysis comparing the treatment of severe abdominal sepsis using open abdomen technique versus primary closure after laparotomy in a public hospital in the South of Brazil. We utilized data extracted from electronic medical records to perform both descriptive and survival analysis, employing the Kaplan-Meier curve and a log-rank test.
Results: the study sample encompassed 75 laparotomies conducted over a span of 5 years, with 40 cases employing NPWT and 35 cases utilizing primary closure. The overall mortality rate observed was 55%. Notably, survival rates did not exhibit statistical significance when comparing the two methods, even after stratifying the data into separate analysis groups for each technique.
Conclusion: recent publications on this subject have reported some favorable outcomes associated with the open abdomen technique underscoring the pressing need for a standardized approach to managing patients with severe, complicated abdominal sepsis
Keywords
Referências
1 Jawad I, Luksic I, Rafnsson SB. Assessing available information on the burden of sepsis: global estimates of incidence, prevalence and mortality. J Glob Health. 2012;2(1):010404. doi: 10.1186/s13017-018-0183-4.
2 Fleischmann C, Scherag A, Adhikari NK, Hartog CS, Tsaganos T, Schlattmann P, et al. Assessment of Global Incidence and Mortality of Hospital-treated Sepsis. Current Estimates and Limitations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;193(3):259-72. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201504-0781OC.
3 Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
4 Roberts DJ, Ball CG, Kirkpatrick AW. Increased pressure within the abdominal compartment: intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome. CurrOpinCrit Care. 2016;22(2):174-85. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000289.
5 Leligdowicz A, Dodek PM, Norena M, Wong H, Kumar A, Kumar A, et al. Association between source of infection and hospital mortality in patients who have septic shock. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189(10):1204-13. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201310-1875OC.
6 Sartelli M, Abu-Zidan FM, Ansaloni L, Bala M, Beltran MA, Biffl WL, et al. The role of the open abdomen procedure in managing severe abdominal sepsis: WSES position paper. World J Emerg Surg. 2015;10:35. doi: 10.1186/s13017-015-0055-0.
7 Gavelli F, Castello LM, Avanzi GC. Management of sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department. Intern Emerg Med. 2021;16:1649-61. doi: 10.1007/s11739-021-02735-7.
8 Van Ruler O, Mahler CW, Boer KR, Reuland EA, Gooszen HG, Opmeer BC, et al. Comparison of on-demand vs planned relaparotomy strategy in patients with severe peritonitis: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2007;298(8):865-72. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.8.865.
9 De Waele JJ. Abdominal Sepsis. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2016;18(8):23. doi: 10.1007/s11908-016-0531-z.
10 Barbosa ASC, Mendes AL, Gomes RF, Leite AS. Abdômen aberto: um desafio constante. Braz. J. of Development. 2020;6(9):66111-9. doi: 10.34117/bjdv6n9-153.
11 Leppaniemi A, Kimball EJ, De Laet I, Malbrain ML, Balogh ZJ, De Waele JJ. Management of abdominal sepsis--a paradigm shift? Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2015;47(4):400-8. doi: 10.5603/AIT.a2015.0026.
12 Khan A, Hsee L, Mathur S, Civil I. Damage-control laparotomy in nontrauma patients: review of indications and outcomes. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;75(3):365-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31829cb65e.
13 Goussous N, Jenkins DH, Zielinski MD. Primary fascial closure after damage control laparotomy: sepsis vs haemorrhage. Injury. 2014;45(1):151-5. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.01.039.
14 Kirkpatrick AW, Roberts DJ, Faris PD, Ball CG, Kubes P, Tiruta C, et al. Active Negative Pressure Peritoneal Therapy After Abbreviated Laparotomy: The Intraperitoneal Vacuum Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2015;262(1):38-46. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001095.
15 Roberts DJ, Zygun DA, Grendar J, Ball CG, Robertson HL, Ouellet JF, et al. Negative-pressure wound therapy for critically ill adults with open abdominal wounds: A systematic review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(3):629-39. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31825c130e.
16 Kirkpatrick AW, Xiao J, Jenne CN, Roberts DJ. Inflammatory mediators in intra-abdominal sepsis or injury - a scoping review. Crit Care. 2015:19:373. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1093-4.
17 Kubiak BD, Albert SP, Gatto LA, Snyder KP, Maier KG, Vieau CJ, et al. Peritoneal negative pressure therapy prevents multiple organ injury in a chronic porcine sepsis and ischemia/reperfusion model. Shock. 2010;34(5):525-34. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e3181e14cd2.
18 Sartelli M, Catena F, Ansaloni L, Coccolini F, Corbella D, Moore EE, et al. Complicated intra-abdominal infections worldwide: the definitive data of the CIAOW Study World J Emerg Surg. 2014;9:37. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-9-37.
19 Coccolini F, Biffl W, Catena F, Ceresoli M, Chiara O, Cimbanassi S, et al. The open abdomen, indications, management and definitive closure. World J Emerg Surg. 2015;10:32. doi: 10.1186/s13017-015-0026-5.
20 Atema JJ, Gans SL, Boermeester MA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the open abdomen and temporary abdominal closure techniques in non-trauma patients. World J Surg. 2015;39(4):912-25. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2883-6.
21 Quyn AJ, Johnston C, Hall D, Chambers A, Arapova N, Ogston S, et al. The open abdomen and temporary abdominal closure systems--historical evolution and systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(8):e429-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03045.x.
22 Sartelli M, Coccolini F, Kluger Y, et al. WSES/GAIS/SIS-E/WSIS/AAST global clinical pathways for patients with intra-abdominal infections. World J Emerg Surg. 2021;16:49. doi: 10.1186/s13017-021-00387-8.
23 Malig MS, Jenne CN, Ball CG, Roberts DJ, Xiao Z, Kirkpatrick AW. High Mobility Group Box-1 Protein and Outcomes in Critically Ill Surgical Patients Requiring Open Abdominal Management. Mediators Inflamm. 2017;2017:6305387. doi: 10.1155/2017/6305387.
24 Roberts DJ, Jenne CN, Ball CG, Tiruta C, Leger C, Xiao Z, et al. Efficacy and safety of active negative pressure peritoneal therapy for reducing the systemic inflammatory response after damage control laparotomy (the Intra-peritoneal Vacuum Trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14:141. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-141.
25 Person B, Dorfman T, Bahouth H, Osman A, Assalia A, Kluger Y. Abbreviated emergency laparotomy in the non-trauma setting. World J EmergSurg. 2009;4:41. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-4-41.
26 Ribeiro Jr. MAF, Barros EA, Carvalho SM, et al. Estudo comparativo de técnicas de fechamento temporário da cavidade abdominal durante o controle de danos. Rev. Col. Bras. Cir. 2016;43(5):368-73. doi: 10.1590/0100-69912016005015.
27 Kirkpatrick AW, et al. Closed or Open after Source Control Laparotomy for Severe Complicated IntraAbdominal Sepsis (the COOL trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. World J Emerg Surg. 2018;13:26. doi: 10.1186/s13017-018-0183-4.
28 Cheatham ML, Demetriades D, Fabian TC, Kaplan MJ, Miles WS, Schreiber MA, Holcomb JB, Bochicchio G, Sarani B, Rotondo MF. Prospective Study Examining Clinical Outcomes Associated with a Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System and Barker's Vacuum Packing Technique. World J Surg. 2013;37(9): 2018-30. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2080-z.
29 Duarte CG, Fontes CER. Abdome aberto ou fechado pós laparotomia para controle de sepse de foco intra-abdominal complicada: revisão sistemática da literatura. PIBIC/CNPq. FundaçãoAraucária - UEM. 2022.
30 Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008.
31 Evans L, Rodhes A, Alhazzani W, Antonelli M, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. Crit Care Med. 2021;49(11):e1,063-e1143. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005337.
32 Scriba MF, Laing GL, Bruce JL, Sartorius B, Clarke DL. The Role of Planned and On-Demand Relaparotomy in the Developing World. World J Surg. 2016;40(7):1558-64. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3379-8.
33 Lamme B, Boermeester MA, Reitsma JB, Mahler CW, Obertop H, Gouma DJ. Meta-analysis of relaparotomy for secondary peritonitis. Br J Surg. 2002;89(12):1516-24. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02293.x.
34 Opal SM, Dellinger RP, Vincent JL, Masur H, Angus DC. The next generation of sepsis clinical trial designs: what is next after the demise of recombinant human activated protein C? Crit Care Med. 2014;42(7):1714-21. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000325.
35 Gentile LF, Moldawer LL. HMGB1 as a therapeutic target for sepsis: it's all in the timing! Expert OpinTher Targets. 2014;18(3):243-5. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2014.883380.
36 Sartelli M, Catena F, Abu-Zidan FM, Ansaloni L, Biffl WL, Boermeester MA, et al. Management of intra-abdominal infections: recommendations by the WSES 2016 consensus conference. World J Emerg Surg. 2017;12:22. doi: 10.1186/s13017-017-0132-7.
37 Coccolini F, Montori G, Ceresoli M, Catena F, Moore EE, Ivatury R, et al. The role of open abdomen in non-trauma patient: WSES consensus paper. World J Emerg Surg. 2017;12:39. doi: 10.1186/s13017-017-0146-1.
38 Kirkpatrick AW, Roberts DJ, Faris PD, Ball CG, Kubes P, Tiruta C, et al. Active negative pressure peritoneal therapy after abbreviated laparotomy: the intraperitoneal vacuum randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2015;262(1):38-46. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001095.
39 Bruns BR, Ahmad SA, O'Meara L, Tesoriero R, Lauerman M, Klyushnenkova E, et al. Nontrauma open abdomens: A prospective observational study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;80(4):631-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000958.
Submetido em:
21/05/2023
Aceito em:
26/01/2024
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email