Registro de Trauma: análise dos Filtros de Qualidade nos pacientes internados
Trauma Registry: Trauma Quality indicators analysis in hospitalized patients
Luca Giovanni Antonio Pivetta; Pedro de Souza Lucarelli Antunes; Giovanna Mennitti Shimoda; José Gustavo Parreira; Jacqueline Arantes Gianninni Perlingeiro; Jose Cesar Assef
Resumo
Objetivo: implementação de Registro de Trauma (RT) através da plataforma REDCap e validação dos Filtros de Qualidade (FQ) desenvolvidos como pontos de melhora no atendimento ao traumatizado.
Métodos: implementação de coleta contínua dos dados de todos os pacientes adultos admitidos na sala de Trauma da Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo e validação destes na plataforma REDCap; realizada coorte retrospectiva dos dados validados em um período de 6 meses e o impacto dos FQ desenvolvidos no tempo de internação hospitalar, complicações e mortalidade dos pacientes. A correlação do comprometimento dos FQ com os desfechos foi obtida através dos testes de Fisher, Qui-Quadrado, Wilcoxon e Kruskal-Wallis, considerando p<0,05 e IC 95% como significativos.
Resultados: incluídos no estudo 465 pacientes admitidos no período de estudo, com necessidade de internação em 137 casos (29,5%); o número de FQs comprometidos relacionou-se com maior número de complicações (p=0,075) e maior tempo de internação (p=0,028), sobretudo o atraso na ida ao Centro Cirúrgico de fraturas expostas, que aumentou a incidência de complicações graves (p=0,005).
Conclusão: a plataforma REDCap é adequada e útil na implementação de RT, permitindo o uso ético e multicêntrico de dados; os FQs propostos determinam pontos de atenção a serem revistos no atendimento do trauma, permitindo melhorias na qualidade de atendimento ao paciente traumatizado.
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Purpose: to consolidate a Trauma Register (TR) trough REDCap data acquisition platform and to validate, in this context, local Quality Indicators (QI) as improvement opportunities in trauma management.
Methods: continuous data acquisition of all patients admitted in Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo adult Trauma bay and it’s validation in REDCap platform; 6 months retrospective cohort of QI impact in length of hospitalar stay, complications and mortality. Fisher, Chi-squared, Wilcoxon and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to correlate QIs fails with the endpoints, considering p<0.05 and CI <95% as statically significant.
Results: 465 were admitted in Trauma bay, with 137 patients hospitalized (29.5%); the number of QIs compromised were related with more complications (p=0.075) and increased length of stay (p=0.028), especially the delay in open fracture’s surgical management, which increased the severe complications’ incidence (p=0.005).
Conclusion: the REDCap data acquisition platform is useful as a tool for multi center TR implementation, from ethical and logistical point of view; nevertheless, the proposed QIs are validated as attention points in trauma management, allowing improvements in traumatized patients treatment.
Keywords
Referências
1 American College of Surgeons - Committee on Trauma. Advanced Trauma Life Support Care - ATLS. 10 ed., 2018.
2 American College of Surgeons. National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). Disponível em:
3 Canadian Institute for Health Information. National Trauma Registry (NTR). Disponível em:
4 Ministério da Saúde. DATASUS. Informações de Saúde. Morbidade e informações epidemiológicas. Óbitos por Causas Externas em 2020. Disponível em:
5 Ministério da Saúde. DATASUS. Informações de Saúde. Morbidade e informações epidemiológicas. Óbitos por causas externas ocorridos no Brasil no ano de 2020 divididos pelo grande grupo do CID 10. Disponível em:
6 Ministério da Saúde. DATASUS. Informações de Saúde. Morbidade e informações epidemiológicas. Mortes por Quedas ocorridos no Brasil no ano de 2020. Disponível em:
7 World Health Organization. Injuries and Violence: the facts 2014. Disponível em:
8 National Research Council. Accidental Death and Disability: The Neglected Disease of Modern Society. Disponível em:
9 Resources for Optimal Care of the Injured Patient, American College of Surgeons. March, 2022.
10 Zhang GX, Chen K., Zhu HT, et al. Preventable Deaths in Multiple Trauma Patients: The Importance of Auditing and Continuous Quality Improvement. World J Surg. 2020;44(6):1835-43. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05423-3.
11 Yu B, Lee G, Lee MA, Choi K, Hyun S, Jeon Y, et al. Trauma Volume and Performance of a regional Trauma Center in Korea: Initial 5-year analysis. J Trauma Inj. 2020;33(1):31-7. doi: 10.20408/jti.2020.004.
12 Fraga GP. Programas de Qualidade de Atendimento ao Trauma. Medicina, Ribeirão Preto, n. 40, p. 321-328, 2007.
13 Mock C, Lormand JD, Goosen J, et al. Guidelines for essential trauma care. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004.
14 Parreira JG, de Campos T, Perlingeiro JA, et al. Implementation of the trauma registry as a tool for quality improvement in trauma care in a brazilian hospital: the first 12 months. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2015;42(4):265-72. doi: 10.1590/0100-69912015004012.
15 Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine (USA), Committee on Injury Scaling. The abbreviated injury scale-1990 Revision (AIS-90). Des Plaines, IL: Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, 1990.
16 Baker SP, O'Neill B, Haddon W Jr, et al. The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma. 1974;14(3):187-96.
17 Domingues CA, de Sousa RM, Nogueira LS, et al. The role of the New Trauma and Injury Severity Score (NTRISS) for survival prediction. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2011;45(6):1353-8. doi: 10.1590/s0080-62342011000600011.
18 Boyd CR, Tolson MA, Copes WS. Evaluating Trauma Care: The TRISS Method. Trauma Score and The Injury Severity Score. J Trauma. 1987;27(4):370-8.
19 Stelfox HT, Bobranska-Artiuch B, Nathens A, et al. Quality indicators for evaluating trauma care: a scoping review. Arch Surg. 2010;145(3):286-95. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.289.
20 Evans C, Howes D, Pickett W, et al. Audit filters for improving processes of care and clinical outcomes in trauma systems. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;2009(4):CD007590. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007590.pub2.
21 Chun M, Zhang Y, Becnel C, Brown T, Hussein M, Toraih E, et al. New Injury Severity Score and Trauma Injury Severity Score are superior in predicting trauma mortality. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022;92(3):528-34. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003449.
22 Larkin EJ, Jones MK, Young SD, Young JS. Interest of the MGAP score on in-hospital trauma patients: Comparison with TRISS, ISS and NISS scores. Injury. 2022;53(9):3059-64. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.05.024.
23 Höke MH, Usul E, Özkan S. Comparison of Trauma Severity Scores (ISS, NISS, RTS, BIG Score, and TRISS) in Multiple Trauma Patients. J Trauma Nurs. 2021;28(2):100-6. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000567.
24 Mitropolskaya S, Thomassen SS, Udby PM. New Injury Severity Score as a predictor of in-hospital mortality in trauma patients. Ugeskr Laeger. 2023;185(19):V11220704.
25 Kahnamoui K, Lysecki P, Uy C, Farrokhyar F, VanderBeek L, Akhtar-Danesh GG, et al. The TRAAGIC score: early predictors of inpatient mortality in adult trauma patients. Can J Surg. 2020;63(1):E38-E45. doi: 10.1503/cjs.016318.
26 American College of Surgeons. Resources for Optimal Care of the Injured Patient: 1990. Chicago: Committee on Trauma, American College of Surgeons, 1990.
27 Stewart BT, Gyedu A, Quansah R, et al. District-level hospital trauma care audit filters: Delphi technique for defining context-appropriate indicators for quality improvement initiative evaluation in developing countries. Injury. 2016;47(1):211-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.09.007.
28 Horton EE, Krijnen P, Molenaar HM, Schipper IB. Trauma West Research Group. Are the registry data reliable? An audit of a regional trauma registry in the Netherlands. Int J Qual Health Care. 2017;29(1):98-103. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw142.
29 Wu N, Carvalho M, Nwanna-Nzewunwa O, Nana T, Motwani G, Mbeboh SN, et al. Trauma Audit Filters for Regional Referral Hospitals in Cameroon: Mixed-Methods Approach. J Surg Res. 2018;232:578-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.07.048.
30 Berg J, Alvesson HM, Roy N, Ekelund U, Bains L, Chatterjee S, et al. Perceived usefulness of trauma audit filters in urban India: a mixed-methods multicentre Delphi study comparing filters from the WHO and low and middle-income countries. BMJ Open. 2022;12(6):e059948. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059948.
31 Bieler D, Hörster A, Lefering R, Franke A, Waydhas C, Huber-Wagner S, et al. Evaluation of new quality indicators for the TraumaRegister DGU(r) using the systematic QUALIFY methodology. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020;46(3):449-60. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-1055-z.
32 Cameron PA, Gabbe BJ, McNeil JJ, et al. The trauma registry as a statewide quality improvement tool. J Trauma. 2005;59(6):1469-76. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000198350.15936.a1.
33 Bommakanti K, Feldhaus I, Motwani G, et al. Trauma registry implementation in low- and middle-income countries: challenges and opportunities. J Surg Res. 2018:223:72-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.09.039.
34 Min L, Cryer H, Chan CL, et al. Quality of Care Delivered Before vs After a Quality-Improvement Intervention for Acute Geriatric Trauma. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220(5):820-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.041.
35 Antunes PSL, Libório PR, Shimoda GM, Pivetta LGA, Parreira JG, Assef JC. Trauma Quality Indicators' usage limitations in severe trauma patients. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2021;48:e20202769. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20202769.
36 Lucarelli-Antunes PS, Pivetta LGA, Parreira JG, Assef JC. Trauma quality indicators: a way to identify attention points in the treatment of elderly trauma patients. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2020;47:e20202533. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20202533.
37 R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2018
38 Cordts Filho RM, Parreira JG, Perlingeiro JA, Soldá SC, Campos Td, Assef JC. Pelvic fractures as a marker of injury severity in trauma patients. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2011;38(5):310-6.
39 Nascimento IKD, Morad HM, Perlingeiro JAG, Parreira JG, Assef JC. Predictors of pleural complications in trauma patients undergoing tube thoracostomy: A prospective observational study. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2022;49:e20223300. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20223300-en.
40 Habarth-Morales TE, Rios-Diaz AJ, Gadomski SP, et al. Direct to OR resuscitation of abdominal trauma: An NTDB propensity matched outcomes study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022;92(5):792-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003536.
41 Naumann DN, Vincent LE, Pearson N, Beaven A, Smith IM, Smith K, et al. An adapted Clavien-Dindo scoring system in trauma as a clinically meaningful nonmortality endpoint. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83(2):241-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001517.
42 Banerjee N, Bagaria D, Agarwal H, Kumar Katiyar A, Kumar S, Sagar S, et al. Validation of the adapted clavien dindo in trauma (ACDiT) scale to grade management related complications at a level I trauma center. Turk J Surg. 2022;38(4):391-400. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2022.5793.
43 Kovoor JG, Jacobsen JHW, Balogh ZJ. Trauma Care Verification and Quality Improvement Writing Group. Quality improvement strategies in trauma care: review and proposal of 31 novel quality indicators. Med J Aust. 2022;217(7):331-5. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51699.
44 Stelfox HT, Bobranska-Artiuch B, Nathens A, Straus SE. A systematic review of quality indicators for evaluating pediatric trauma care. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(4):1187-96. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181d455fe.
Submetido em:
01/06/2023
Aceito em:
04/12/2023
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email