Eviscerações são evitáveis?
Are eviscerations preventable?
Julio Fernandes Tomasi; Fabielle Menezes Tolfo; Lais Madeira Constantino; Felipe Antônio Cacciatori
Resumo
Introdução: A incidência de eviscerações é de 3,5% na literatura. O uso de telas profiláticas em pacientes com alto risco de evisceração tem sido estudado. O objetivo deste estudo é avaliar as características dos pacientes submetidos à ressutura da parede abdominal devido evisceração e verificar o benefício do uso de tela profilática nesta amostra.
Métodos: Trata-se de estudo retrospectivo do tipo coorte, que analisou os prontuários de pacientes submetidos ao procedimento de ressutura de parede abdominal entre janeiro de 2010 e dezembro de 2023 em um hospital terciário. Os critérios de inclusão foram pacientes submetidos à ressutura de parede abdominal no hospital de estudo, com cirurgia índex no mesmo hospital e acesso mediano. Pacientes menores de 18 anos, pacientes submetidos a cirurgias videolaparoscópicas e acessos não medianos foram excluídos. O escore de risco para deiscência de aponeurose de Rotterdam, modificado por Lima, foi utilizado como parâmetro.
Resultados: A amostra final de 252 pacientes foi composta por 74,2% de homens. A mediana de idade foi de 64 anos e a mediana de IMC foi de 24,3kg/m2. A mediana do intervalo de dias entre a cirurgia e a ressutura foi de 8 dias. A hemoglobina mediana foi de 11,1g/dL. A prevalência, na amostra, de neoplasia, tabagismo e DPOC foi de 47,2%, 32,1% e 13%, respectivamente. Cirurgias eletivas foram 58,8%.
Conclusão: Concluiu-se que, utilizando o escore de Rotterdam modificado, dos 227 pacientes, 164 (72,2%) teriam recebido tela profilática, o que, potencialmente, teria evitado a evisceração.
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Introduction: The incidence of eviscerations is 3.5% in the literature. The use of prophylactic meshes in patients at high risk of evisceration has been studied. The objective of this study is to evaluate the characteristics of patients undergoing abdominal wall resuturing due to evisceration and verify the benefit of using prophylactic mesh in this sample.
Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study, which analyzed the medical records of patients who underwent abdominal wall resuturing procedures between January 2010 and December 2023 in a tertiary hospital. The inclusion criteria were patients who underwent abdominal wall resuturing in the study hospital, with index surgery in the same hospital and median access. Patients under 18 years of age, patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery and non-median access were excluded. The Rotterdam risk score for aponeurosis dehiscence, modified by Lima, was used as a parameter.
Results: The final sample of 252 patients was made up of 74.2% men. The median age was 64 years and the median BMI was 24.3kg/m2. The median number of days between surgery and resuturing was 8. The median hemoglobin was 11.1g/dL. The incidence of neoplasia, smoking and COPD was 47.2%, 32.1% and 13% respectively. Elective surgeries were 58.8%.
Conclusion: It was concluded that, using the modified Rotterdam score, of the 227 patients, 164 (72.2%) would have received prophylactic mesh, which potentially would have prevented evisceration.
Keywords
Referências
1 Harlaar JJ, Deerenberg EB, van Ramshorst GH, et al. A multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of small stitches on the incidence of incisional hernia in midline incisions. BMC Surg. 2011:11:20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-11-20.
2 Borile G, Valente DS, Pizzol MMD, Dreher R, Nunes CCA. Diagnóstico epidemiológico de evisceração em cirurgia geral. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2003;30(5):388-91. doi: 10.1590/S0100-69912003000500010.
3 Webster C, Neumayer L, Smout R, et al. Prognostic models of abdominal wound dehiscence after laparotomy. J Surg Res. 2003;109(2):130-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-4804(02)00097-5.
4 Riou JP, Cohen JR, Johnson H Jr. Factors influencing wound dehiscence. Am J Surg. 1992;163:324-30. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(92)90014-i.
5 Swaroop M, Williams M, Greene WR, et al. Multiple laparotomies are a predictor of fascial dehiscence in the setting of severe trauma. Am Surg. 2005;71:402-5.
6 Rodríguez-Hermosa JI, Codina-Cazador A, Ruiz B, et al. Risk factors for acute abdominal wall dehiscence after laparotomy in adults. Cir Esp. 2005;77:280-6. doi: 10.1016/s0009-739x(05)70854-x.
7 Pavlidis TE, Galatianos IN, Papaziogas BT, et al. Complete dehiscence of the abdominal wound and incriminating factors. Eur J Surg. 2001;167:351-4; discussion 355. doi: 10.1080/110241501750215221.
8 Ozcan C, Colak T, Turkmenoglu O, et al. Impact of small-bite (5mm) fascial closure on the incidence of incisional hernia following open colorectal cancer surgery: randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg. 2024;111(8):znae189. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae189.
9 Lima HVG, Rasslan R, Novo FCF, et al. Prevention of Fascial Dehiscence with Onlay Prophylactic Mesh in Emergency Laparotomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2020;230:76-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.09.010.
10 Abo-Ryia MH, El-Khadrawy OH, Abd-Allah HS. Prophylactic preperitoneal mesh placement in open bariatric surgery: a guard against incisional hernia development. Obes Surg. 2013;23:1571-4. doi: 10.1007/s11695-013-0915-1.
11 Herbert GS, Tausch TJ, Carter PL. Prophylactic mesh to prevent incisional hernia: a note of caution. Am J Surg. 2009;197:595-8; discussion 598. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.01.002.
12 Dasari M, Wessel CB, Hamad GG. Prophylactic mesh placement for prevention of incisional hernia after open bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2016; 212(4):615-22.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.06.004.
13 Muysoms FE, Detry O, Vierendeels T, et al. Prevention of Incisional Hernias by Prophylactic Mesh-augmented Reinforcement of Midline Laparotomies for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2016;263:638-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001369.
14 Indrakusuma R, Jalalzadeh H, van der Meij JE, et al. Prophylactic Mesh Reinforcement versus Sutured Closure to Prevent Incisional Hernias after Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair via Midline Laparotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018;56(1):120-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.03.021.
15 Nieuwenhuizen J, Eker HH, Timmermans L, et al. A double blind randomized controlled trial comparing primary suture closure with mesh augmented closure to reduce incisional hernia incidence. BMC Surg. 2013;13:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-13-48.
16 García-Ureña MÁ, López-Monclús J, Hernando LAB, et al. Randomized controlled trial of the use of a large-pore polypropylene mesh to prevent incisional hernia in colorectal surgery. Ann Surg. 2015;261(5):876-81. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001116.
17 Argudo N, Iskra MP, Pera M, et al. The use of an algorithm for prophylactic mesh use in high risk patients reduces the incidence of incisional hernia following laparotomy for colorectal cancer resection. Cir Esp. 2017;95(4):222-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2017.03.010.
18 Hidalgo MP, Ferrero EH, Ortiz MA, et al. Incisional hernia in patients at risk: can it be prevented? Hernia. 2011;15(4):371-5. doi: 10.1007/s10029-011-0794-0.
19 El-Khadrawy OH, Moussa G, Mansour O, et al. Prophylactic prosthetic reinforcement of midline abdominal incisions in high-risk patients. Hernia. 2009;13(3):267-74. doi: 10.1007/s10029-009-0484-3.
20 Argudo N, Pereira JA, Sancho JJ, et al. Prophylactic synthetic mesh can be safely used to close emergency laparotomies, even in peritonitis. Surgery. 2014;156(5):1238-44. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.04.035.
21 Gutiérrez de la Peña C, Medina Achirica C, Domínguez-Adame E, et al. Primary closure of laparotomies with high risk of incisional hernia using prosthetic material: analysis of usefulness. Hernia. 2003;7(3):134-6. doi: 10.1007/s10029-003-0124-2.
22 Kurmann A, Barnetta C, Candinas D, et al. Implantation of prophylactic nonabsorbable intraperitoneal mesh in patients with peritonitis is safe and feasible. World J Surg. 2013;37(7):1656-60. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2019-4.
23 Kohler A, Lavanchy JL, Lenoir U, et al. Effectiveness of Prophylactic Intraperitoneal Mesh Implantation for Prevention of Incisional Hernia in Patients Undergoing Open Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(2):109-15. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4221.
24 van Ramshorst GH, Nieuwenhuizen J, Hop WCJ, et al. Abdominal wound dehiscence in adults: development and validation of a risk model. World J Surg. 2010;34(1):20-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0277-y.
25 Gómez Díaz CJ, Rebasa Cladera P, Navarro Soto S, et al. Validation of abdominal wound dehiscence's risk model. Cir Esp. 2014;92:114-19.
26 von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008.
27 Mir MA, Manzoor F, Singh B, et al. Development of a risk model for abdominal wound dehiscence. Surg Sci. 2016;7(10):466-74. doi: 10.4236/ss.2016.710063.
28 Carson JL, Duff A, Poses RM, et al. Effect of anaemia and cardiovascular disease on surgical mortality and morbidity. Lancet. 1996;348:1055-1060.
29 Carson JL, Noveck H, Berlin JA, et al. Mortality and morbidity in patients with very low postoperative Hb levels who decline blood transfusion. Transfusion. 2002;42(7):812-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2002.00123.x.
30 Strzelczyk J, Czupryniak L, Loba J, et al. The use of polypropylene mesh in midline incision closure following gastric by-pass surgery reduces the risk of postoperative hernia. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2002;387(7-8):294-7. doi: 10.1007/s00423-002-0325-7.
31 Straubhar AM, Stroup C, Manorot A, et al. Small bite fascial closure technique reduces incisional hernia rates in gynecologic oncology patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2024;34(5):745-50. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004966.
32 Deerenberg EB, Henriksen NA, Antoniou GA, et al. Updated guideline for closure of abdominal wall incisions from the European and American Hernia Societies. Br J Surg. 2022;109(12):1239-50. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac302.
Submetido em:
28/08/2024